ivy.nvim/rust/sorter.rs
Xymist cec8393770 Remove multithreading for sorting
The relevant processes are so fast, mutexes and mutex locks are so
expensive, and iterators so efficient, that it's actually faster to run
single-threaded across all the data than to spin up a bunch of threads
and have them basically spinlock waiting for the global mutex involved
either directly or in a channel.

ivy_files(kubernetes)   time:   [10.209 ms 10.245 ms 10.286 ms]
                        change: [-36.781% -36.178% -35.601%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        Performance has improved.

ivy_match(file.lua)     time:   [1.1626 µs 1.1668 µs 1.1709 µs]
                        change: [+0.2131% +1.5409% +2.9109%] (p = 0.02 < 0.05)
                        Change within noise threshold.
2022-08-26 16:29:11 +01:00

39 lines
823 B
Rust

use super::matcher;
use super::thread_pool;
use std::sync::mpsc;
use std::sync::Arc;
pub struct Match {
pub score: i64,
pub content: String,
}
pub struct Options {
pub pattern: String,
pub minimun_score: i64,
}
impl Options {
pub fn new(pattern: String) -> Self {
Self {
pattern,
minimun_score: 20,
}
}
}
pub fn sort_strings(options: Options, strings: Vec<String>) -> Vec<Match> {
let matcher = matcher::Matcher::new(options.pattern);
let mut matches = strings
.into_iter()
.map(|candidate| Match {
score: matcher.score(candidate.as_str()),
content: candidate,
})
.filter(|m| m.score > 25)
.collect::<Vec<Match>>();
matches.sort_by(|a, b| a.score.cmp(&b.score));
matches
}